ArgonDigital - enterprise automation experts

Share This Post

Live from REFSQ’09: The ROM, Experiences with a Requirements Object Model

What follows is a summary of the paper I wrote with James Hulgan (also from ArgonDigital) and presented at REFSQ’09 last week. The paper is titled “Experiences with a Requirements Object Model”. You can get the actual paper here.

Most software projects we’ve seen develop features that don’t add value or they don’t build what they actually do need in order to achieve the intended business value. This leads to project that are over budget, late, and often canceled because they don’t really satisfy the needs. Fundamental to this, most project teams don’t know the Business Objectives that tell them why they are doing the project in the first place, so it’s not surprising they have a hard time picking the right features to develop.

Business Objectives are hard to elicit. When teams get an answer like “increase profitability” they are complacent to stop there because they don’t want to or know how to push people to give the hard answers.

Our paper discussed the basic terminology as described by many industry experts to describe this “thing”. They use business objectives, goals, needs, business requirements, user requirements, etc. And there are subtle differences behind each of these from person-to-person. But for our work, we are using “Business Objective” to mean: the desired metrics the business seeks to meet in order to solve the business problems.

Terminology is just a small part of the problem, but the bigger issue is this: If you ask a project team why they are doing this project, they often have no concrete idea. They may have a vague phrase associated with it such as “We are reducing operating costs”. Sometimes we hear them say that they are sure the executives know because there was a business case developed – but the project team has not seen it. It’s as if you can develop the business case, start the project, and never need to look at it again. And this is where the problem lies. The Business Objectives, probably in that very business case, should be driving the feature set developed.

We were looking for a model to use to identify and represent these, as well as to train our people on to elicit them. Out of that came the ROM – Requirements Object Model.

Tune in tomorrow for a description of the ROM!

Live from REFSQ’09: The ROM, Experiences with a Requirements Object Model

More To Explore

AI to Write Requirements

How We Use AI to Write Requirements

At ArgonDigital, we’ve been writing requirements for 22 years. I’ve watched our teams waste hours translating notes into requirements. Now, we’ve cut the nonsense with AI. Our teams can spend

ArgonDigital | Making Technology a Strategic Advantage